Skip to main content

Integration Project- Micro Services Migration Story with JBoss BPM Travel Agency - Part Two

Part two - Moving towards Microservices


Recently "microservices" has become a popular phenomena in application development, if you google it, you will find hundreds definition, best practice and design patterns on this new software architecture. To me, this is not new, back on the "SOA" days, I found the hardest thing for us, is to decide the granularity of the services. That is, deciding how much data each service needs to provide, without wasting too much resource in each client call, or have tiny services that client needs to orchestrate and manage everything. For many "political" reasons, we weren't able to provide service with reasonable size, they needs to be huge with loads of business logic. At the time "Monolithic Applications" was the mainstream way of application development and deployment. As a developer, we hated the decision, because it would involve too many people to just push out one service releases. We came up with an idea of breaking the services down into many modules, and each module simply does very simple functions. We had no choice because it would be a headache to manage the team of eight, and having them wait for each other. The way we implement it, is through use of EJB call, can dependency JARs. As it's still deployed as on big monolithic applications, scaling part of the service became a problem. The only thing we can do it to added more server running the application. At the time, we had the idea of micro services, it's just the technology just isn't complete to support us. Now that application container became lightweight, it's cheap to spin up one and having it just run one single task. And with the fast computing power, and simple data exchange format like JSON, now it's alright to make service call asynchronize, there are many advantages when it's asynchronized. Might cover that in other post. So when I see the travel agency project, I think it is a great example to show how micro services can be done using JBoss Fuse.


The Travel Agency Demo showcase a business process for a user to request a holiday itinerary, it'll look up the available flight and hotel, and booked the flight and hotel respectively, if the credit card is invalid, it will cancel the booking. The original application was in JavaEE, everything is all packaged and wrote in the same package. It'll face the problem when it tries to scale-up any of the services.

During the re-construction , I want to make sure it does not impact the original business flow. So it's provide the same services as it is. OK, now we start moving to microservice. First of all, breaking down to smaller pieces, because Flight and Hotel are in nature different services, so I separate them in two. In the application, it has web service endpoints to talk to BPM Suite or other client, and at the backend, the available data and booking data are stored in a Database. In between front and backend, I decide to make the communication async, so it's easier to scale-out and make sure it's absolutely decoupled, and language independent.
For backend, it needs to provide 3 different functionality,
  1. Recommend 1 available Flight/Hotel 
  2. Book and record Flight/Hotel 
  3. Cancel previous booking of Flight/Hotel 
You would think I'll break them into 3 services, and deploy them separately into different container right? Nope! I am not going to do it ,this time. Instead, I'll be breaking them into 2 projects, one give a promoted recommendation of hotel/flight, the other handles booking and canceling. The reason business-wise, putting booking and cancellation together is they logically belong together, you need the booking number to cancel a booking, if anything changes to booking, then it may alway impact cancellation. And technology-wise because I use JDBC to retrieve the list, and JPA for both Booking and Cancellation, so the configuration are shared for both booking and cancellation. That's why I want to group them together.

 

It is very easy for people to over-do the microservice, for me it's not all about breaking down service to make it do one thing per service, but to make it easier for developer to maintain and make sense logically. But what if one day booking and cancellation needs to separate? Don't worry, one thing JBoss Fuse is great to implement microservice is the way we can break different functions into different Camel routes. So when it's time to separate them, it's simply the matter of moving the route to another project.


(Project contains 2 routes, booking and canceling)

(Booking route)

(Cancel Booking route)

This is how I move the monolithic application to a more microservice approach. Now it's going to be much easier to scale out, and the application will have less impact to other application if anything goes wrong. From the diagram, you can see now, we can add a gateway in front to dispatch loads to the two containers listening and waiting for incoming request, and have messaging broker to serve as another layer of buffer.


OK, enough of the architecture talk, next time, we'll take a look at how to migrate web service to JBoss Fuse. (Contract-first Web Service in Camel).

For more detail side in BPM Suite, please click here to Eric Schabell's post.

Micro Services Migration Story with JBoss BPM Travel Agency
Part One: Introduction and Installation
Part Two: Moving towards Microservices

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Hat Fuse - Announcing Fuse 7 Tech preview 3 release.

Red Hat Fuse 7.0 technical preview three is out today! On the pathway to become one of the best cloud-native integration platform, Fuse gives developer freedom to choose how they want to develop the integration solution, where they want to deploy it and capabilities to address new integration personas that do not have development experience.
By supporting the three major runtime, developer is free to work on the runtime of their choice.By supporting standalone and cloud deployment, it simplifies the complexity to distinguish between these environments, allowing application to deploy freely among the environment of your choice. All levels of developers are welcome, you can either dive deep into creating customize complex integration logic, or using the new low code platform to quickly build a simple integration. In this Tech Preview release you get it all.
Fuse StandaloneSpring-boot for microserviceKaraf 4 for OSGi loverJBoss EAP for JavaEE developersFuse on OpenShiftPlugins for easy co…

JBoss EAP 6 - 效能調校 (一) DataSource 的 Connection Pool

效能沒有什麼Best Practice, 反正能調整的就那些。 通常,一個程式的效能大概有70-80% 都跟程式怎麼寫的其實比較有關係。

最近我最疼愛的小貓Puji 因為膀胱結石開刀的時候過世了,心情很差請原諒我的口氣沒有很好,也沒有心情寫部落格。

Puji R.I.P.

=======================正文=======================

這個題目很多人叫我寫,可是這題目好大,這分明就是整死我咩~
所以我會分幾段慢慢寫。

JBoss 的 SubsystemDatasource WebWeb Service EJB Hibernate JMSJCAJVM 調校OS (作業系統)

先來看一下 DataSource Subsystem, DataSource 的部分主要是針對Connection Pool 做調校。

通常,程式都會需要跟資料庫界接,電腦在本機,尤其是在記憶體的運算很快,但是一旦要外部的資源連接,就是會非常的耗資源。所以現在的應用程式伺服器都會有個Pool 放一些先連接好的 資料庫connection,當程式有需要的時候就可以馬上提供,而不用花那些多餘的資源去連接資料庫。

這就是為什麼要針對Connection Pool 去做調校。

以下會討論到的參數,都是跟效能比較有關係,Datasource 還有很多參數,像是檢核connection 是否正確的,我都不會提到。如果你追求的是非常快速的效能,那我建議你一個檢核都不要加。當然,這樣就會為伺服器上面執行的程式帶來風險。這就是你要在效能與正確,安全性上面的取捨了。 (套句我朋友說的話,不可能又要馬兒好,又要馬兒不吃草的..)

最重要的調校參數就是 Connection 的 Pool 數量。(也就是那個Pool 裡面要放幾條的connection.) 這個參數是每一個應用程式都不一樣的。

min-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最少會存留的connection 數量

max-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最多可以開啓的 connection 數量

prefill

事先將connection pool 裡面建立好min-pool-size 的connection.

我的建議是觀察一下平常程式要用到的量設定為 min-pool-size 。
加上…

Fuse - Contract First API Design with Apicurio and Fuse/Camel - Part One

This is part one of my two-article series that demonstrates the approach of implementing contract-first API design using Apicurioand Red Hat Fuse.

It covers how to create an OpenAPI standard document as the contract between API providers and consumers using Apicurio. It also shows how to quickly create mock tests using Red Hat Fuse.

There are two common approaches of creating these APIs.
Code FirstContract First Coming from a old time ESB developer, these are not new. We have been doing this forever. Before, it was the WSDL that define the contract of the service. we were doing a lot more code first, for me it's simply because it's much easier for me to write couple of Java classes and generate the WSDL for my consumer. 

It's often pretty straightforward if the consumer of your application has finalized how they want the service to be like. But you and I all know this is not often the case. So I had to go back to my code, and make the changes accordingly and pray I did not …