Skip to main content

Red Hat JBoss xPaaS - When xPaaS meets DEVOPS - Part Four

This post is part of short session I spoke in Japan, strictly my opinion.

Automation plays an essential role in DEVOPS, the entire cycle will cripple without automation, the whole idea of DEVOPS is to speed up the process inside enterprise, and relief developer and operation from day to day repetitively meaningless routines. Automation meaning that anything the machine can do, make the machine do it. In the old day, due to technology limitation, politics or if it's just simply not having time to do it, there are many jobs that needs to have human involve. If you seriously want to introduce DEVOPS, You will find that you spend majority of time dealing with automations.

There are few aspect in Automation in the DEVOPS lifecycle, let's take a look at my real life experience, it's one of the most anti-automation case I have ever seen in many years of my consulting career. This happens in one of the SI company, where they were responsible for maintaining a banking solution for a bank, due to many reason, their project has failed to deliver the full function on time, so their project manager decided to move the current version to production first as phase one, then deliver the rest of the services later when it's ready. It was a large monolith application, the developer in the project will push out a version of the application, then a quality assurance personnel will come in and test that version of the application, the scope of the application was huge, plus the new function, it take a day or 2 for the QA to test and return the feedback to the developers. By the time the developer receives the feedback, he/she has already pushed out 2 more version, now he has to go back to the problematic version, and fix it, for me as a developer, I hate being interrupt in the middle of something, and go back to the code 2 week before and try to remember, pick up and fix bug. It's not the problem of fixing the bug, if the feed back could of given to developer right after the code to is out, it'll save a lot of time from all these recaps. This process has taken 2 weeks in the QA cycle before it is pushed to production. The operation then take the application, create an pre-production environment, and then it is tested again, of course by human again. A normal function for this bank will normally take about a month.



This is an extreme case, and I see many improvements can be done, but most importantly, eliminating the human testing routines and should be the top priority. To help speed up the automatic testing, in Red Hat JBoss xPaaS, you can setup an CI server such as Jenkins, that detect from our version control repo, which is built-in in xPaaS using Git. So when everything there is a push to the git, the CI server can detect it, then automatically create an production like container to hold the application, then it can automatically deploy and test the current version. Of course, to make the automation of testing easier, one might also want to consider breaking down applications into smaller pieces, and have these smaller pieces deploy on separate container, this makes testing unit simple and quick. Because of the nature in xPaaS, it is very easy for xPaaS to quickly spin up a container, without heavy involvement of developer and operations. Allowing this will make the whole architecture to become more agile and more flexible.

Normally automating these processes are difficult, because you will need to take in account on different version, software, networks and other environment factors. That makes automation complex, Red Hat JBoss xPaaS has a range of middleware already built-in so there is no need to care about the installation script, that make the entire automation much quicker and easier to maintain.
That's all for automation, next time it's the last part of the series, Continuous Delivery.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

JBoss EAP 6 - 效能調校 (一) DataSource 的 Connection Pool

效能沒有什麼Best Practice, 反正能調整的就那些。 通常,一個程式的效能大概有70-80% 都跟程式怎麼寫的其實比較有關係。

最近我最疼愛的小貓Puji 因為膀胱結石開刀的時候過世了,心情很差請原諒我的口氣沒有很好,也沒有心情寫部落格。

Puji R.I.P.

=======================正文=======================

這個題目很多人叫我寫,可是這題目好大,這分明就是整死我咩~
所以我會分幾段慢慢寫。

JBoss 的 SubsystemDatasource WebWeb Service EJB Hibernate JMSJCAJVM 調校OS (作業系統)

先來看一下 DataSource Subsystem, DataSource 的部分主要是針對Connection Pool 做調校。

通常,程式都會需要跟資料庫界接,電腦在本機,尤其是在記憶體的運算很快,但是一旦要外部的資源連接,就是會非常的耗資源。所以現在的應用程式伺服器都會有個Pool 放一些先連接好的 資料庫connection,當程式有需要的時候就可以馬上提供,而不用花那些多餘的資源去連接資料庫。

這就是為什麼要針對Connection Pool 去做調校。

以下會討論到的參數,都是跟效能比較有關係,Datasource 還有很多參數,像是檢核connection 是否正確的,我都不會提到。如果你追求的是非常快速的效能,那我建議你一個檢核都不要加。當然,這樣就會為伺服器上面執行的程式帶來風險。這就是你要在效能與正確,安全性上面的取捨了。 (套句我朋友說的話,不可能又要馬兒好,又要馬兒不吃草的..)

最重要的調校參數就是 Connection 的 Pool 數量。(也就是那個Pool 裡面要放幾條的connection.) 這個參數是每一個應用程式都不一樣的。

min-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最少會存留的connection 數量

max-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最多可以開啓的 connection 數量

prefill

事先將connection pool 裡面建立好min-pool-size 的connection.

我的建議是觀察一下平常程式要用到的量設定為 min-pool-size 。
加上…

Red Hat JBoss Fuse/A-MQ - Fuse and A-MQ Version 6.3 GA is released!

Fuse and A-MQ 6.3 GA has just went out. Maybe, you would think this is just only a minor version release why should I care? Hold your thoughts on that! Because they have done a lot of improvements and also added many new features into this release.

Besides various bug fixes and making sure Fuse Fabric is much more stable. There are two major change in this version update:

New Tooling in JBoss Developer Studio (JBDS) 9.1 GA. Newer Apache Camel version – Camel v2.17. I was really impressed by the work put in to make developing Camel application much simpler. First is the installation of tooling itself. Now it has a all-in-one installer so you don't need to worry about which plugins you need to check. See the videos below to see the new "Getting Started" of Fuse 6.3.



And If you notice from the above video, the presentation of camel route in JBDS has also updated. It fixed some of the miss representation of logic and making it easier to read.

Old Camel Route
New Camel Route
On …

Red Hat JBoss Fuse - Getting Started with Fuse Integration Service 2.0 Tech preview

I just realized that I did not do a getting started for Fuse Integration Service 2.0 Tech preview before I did the pipeline demo, thanks for those of you who reminded me! :)

To get started with FIS 2.0, for people who has just getting to know the technology, here is how I interpret it. Basically, it's divide into two aspect,

1. Integration development, FIS uses Apache Camel as the core technology that creates, orchestrate, compose microservices into a super lightweight thin integration layer, and become the API provider and service orchestrator through exposing RESTful or messaging service endpoints. And you can choose to either package and run it with Spring-Boot or Karaf.


2. Application Deployment and Management, FIS takes advantages of OpenShift platform, and allows you to separately deploy the micro-integration service among distributed environment, at the same time takes care of the failover, high availability, load balancing and service lookup problem for you.


So, now we know …