Skip to main content

Red Hat JBoss Fuse - Moving Camel application between OSGi and JavaEE containers

Now that JBoss Fuse supports both OSGi Karaf and JavaEE JBoss EAP container. When to use which one, is there any best practice for which container to use? And same as the answer as any other software related question, well, any questions in life actually. "it depends" .... Situation varies between cases, here are my point of view, you many like it or disagree, I am very happy to hear more of your thoughts.

Here is the thing, I think, it is BEST if you stick with Karaf container if possible for now. It is more light weight, which means you can deploy application much more quickly and expend faster horizontally with application distributed everywhere. And the may OSGi manages the lifecycle of the services allows you to dynamically deploy and undeploy service without affecting the others service in the same container. That, is very important in for mission critical services. So if you get to choose which ever to use go with Karaf.
What I also believe is, in an enterprise you should not be restricted to use Single kind of container, different container framework exist for a reason. Especially if you are providing a web application with EJB, JARs complex application glue together to serve as the core business for the web application. Maybe it's a legacy application that has everything done in the Application server. Or it simply has too many non-OSGi compatible libraries to work with. Then I will go for the JBoss EAP scenario.

So how to move from OSGi to JavaEE container or vise versa? Moving a bundle from OSGi to JavaEE is dead simple. But please note, use the Spring framework instead of Blueprint, if you are using OSGi, I would first convert it Spring then work with it.

In this case I will be using a WAR application, since most people use this format in JavaEE and it is supported in Karaf as well.

So there are few ground rules if you want to switch back and forth between the containers, is


  • Use Spring Framework
  • Make sure your Camel route is placed under META-INF under webapp and named *-camel-context.xml

  • Set you plugins to generate metadata needed for OSGi container.
    • Add maven-bundle-plugin        
       <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId>
        <version>2.3.7</version>
        <extensions>true</extensions>
        <executions>
          <execution>
            <id>bundle-manifest</id>
            <phase>process-classes</phase>
            <goals>
              <goal>manifest</goal>
            </goals>
          </execution>
        </executions>
        <configuration>
          <supportedProjectTypes>
            <supportedProjectType>jar</supportedProjectType>
            <supportedProjectType>bundle</supportedProjectType>
            <supportedProjectType>war</supportedProjectType>
          </supportedProjectTypes>
          <instructions>
            <Bundle-SymbolicName>camel-blueprint</Bundle-SymbolicName>
            <Private-Package>com.redhat.springtest</Private-Package>
            <Import-Package>*</Import-Package>
          </instructions>
        </configuration>
       </plugin>

By sticking with these rules will allow you to create a project that can deploy on both containers.
In JBoss Fuse Karaf Container,

  • Install with Profile or using OSGi command, 
    • war:mvn:com.redhat/springtest/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/war?Web-ContextPath=springtest
  • Make sure to have feature-fabric-web profile in your container

Running JBoss EAP Container with Fuse application.

  • Deploy and install by
    • Drag and drop the WAR file under deployment folder
    • Using Console/CLI deployment
  • Make sure Fuse subsystem is installed and activated. 
  • Remember to disable ContextLoaderListener in web.xml

Here is a video showing how to move application between containers.

Comments

Unknown said…
Hi Christina,
Very helpful post, have you uploaded the sources of the example anywhere ?
Thanks !
Shoaib Khan said…
Hi Christina,

Thanks for the insight and sharing your views on this. Actually after trying JBoss Fuse 6.3 on EAP I felt the same.

Just to clarify, doesn't it mean Red Hat is taking away the concept of Microservices with this new model of deployment where again it goes like huge WAR deployment and aweful method of manual configurations? Why not to just stick with Apache Karaf + Camel as the best ESB solution in the world adhering to Micro Services archicture and lifting all the load of such manual configurations and confusions. After using Fuse ESB with blueprint DSL i even don't see need for Spring DSL for ESBs. Ofcouse spring/java or any other DSL can be used in embedded integration solutions. But I really don't see any need to bundle JBoss Fuse with EAP.

I fear if in future Red Hat might discontinue the Karaf backend container and only provide support for EAP. That would be the worst decision in my opinion.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Hat Fuse - Announcing Fuse 7 Tech preview 3 release.

Red Hat Fuse 7.0 technical preview three is out today! On the pathway to become one of the best cloud-native integration platform, Fuse gives developer freedom to choose how they want to develop the integration solution, where they want to deploy it and capabilities to address new integration personas that do not have development experience.
By supporting the three major runtime, developer is free to work on the runtime of their choice.By supporting standalone and cloud deployment, it simplifies the complexity to distinguish between these environments, allowing application to deploy freely among the environment of your choice. All levels of developers are welcome, you can either dive deep into creating customize complex integration logic, or using the new low code platform to quickly build a simple integration. In this Tech Preview release you get it all.
Fuse StandaloneSpring-boot for microserviceKaraf 4 for OSGi loverJBoss EAP for JavaEE developersFuse on OpenShiftPlugins for easy co…

JBoss EAP 6 - 效能調校 (一) DataSource 的 Connection Pool

效能沒有什麼Best Practice, 反正能調整的就那些。 通常,一個程式的效能大概有70-80% 都跟程式怎麼寫的其實比較有關係。

最近我最疼愛的小貓Puji 因為膀胱結石開刀的時候過世了,心情很差請原諒我的口氣沒有很好,也沒有心情寫部落格。

Puji R.I.P.

=======================正文=======================

這個題目很多人叫我寫,可是這題目好大,這分明就是整死我咩~
所以我會分幾段慢慢寫。

JBoss 的 SubsystemDatasource WebWeb Service EJB Hibernate JMSJCAJVM 調校OS (作業系統)

先來看一下 DataSource Subsystem, DataSource 的部分主要是針對Connection Pool 做調校。

通常,程式都會需要跟資料庫界接,電腦在本機,尤其是在記憶體的運算很快,但是一旦要外部的資源連接,就是會非常的耗資源。所以現在的應用程式伺服器都會有個Pool 放一些先連接好的 資料庫connection,當程式有需要的時候就可以馬上提供,而不用花那些多餘的資源去連接資料庫。

這就是為什麼要針對Connection Pool 去做調校。

以下會討論到的參數,都是跟效能比較有關係,Datasource 還有很多參數,像是檢核connection 是否正確的,我都不會提到。如果你追求的是非常快速的效能,那我建議你一個檢核都不要加。當然,這樣就會為伺服器上面執行的程式帶來風險。這就是你要在效能與正確,安全性上面的取捨了。 (套句我朋友說的話,不可能又要馬兒好,又要馬兒不吃草的..)

最重要的調校參數就是 Connection 的 Pool 數量。(也就是那個Pool 裡面要放幾條的connection.) 這個參數是每一個應用程式都不一樣的。

min-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最少會存留的connection 數量

max-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最多可以開啓的 connection 數量

prefill

事先將connection pool 裡面建立好min-pool-size 的connection.

我的建議是觀察一下平常程式要用到的量設定為 min-pool-size 。
加上…

Fuse - Contract First API Design with Apicurio and Fuse/Camel - Part One

This is part one of my two-article series that demonstrates the approach of implementing contract-first API design using Apicurioand Red Hat Fuse.

It covers how to create an OpenAPI standard document as the contract between API providers and consumers using Apicurio. It also shows how to quickly create mock tests using Red Hat Fuse.

There are two common approaches of creating these APIs.
Code FirstContract First Coming from a old time ESB developer, these are not new. We have been doing this forever. Before, it was the WSDL that define the contract of the service. we were doing a lot more code first, for me it's simply because it's much easier for me to write couple of Java classes and generate the WSDL for my consumer. 

It's often pretty straightforward if the consumer of your application has finalized how they want the service to be like. But you and I all know this is not often the case. So I had to go back to my code, and make the changes accordingly and pray I did not …