Skip to main content

Red Hat JBoss Fuse - Getting Started with Fuse Integration Service 2.0 Tech preview

I just realized that I did not do a getting started for Fuse Integration Service 2.0 Tech preview before I did the pipeline demo, thanks for those of you who reminded me! :)

To get started with FIS 2.0, for people who has just getting to know the technology, here is how I interpret it. Basically, it's divide into two aspect,

1. Integration development, FIS uses Apache Camel as the core technology that creates, orchestrate, compose microservices into a super lightweight thin integration layer, and become the API provider and service orchestrator through exposing RESTful or messaging service endpoints. And you can choose to either package and run it with Spring-Boot or Karaf.


2. Application Deployment and Management, FIS takes advantages of OpenShift platform, and allows you to separately deploy the micro-integration service among distributed environment, at the same time takes care of the failover, high availability, load balancing and service lookup problem for you.


So, now we know what is in FIS 2.0, it's time to take a closer look at how it is done, as a developer, you first have to decide to go with Karaf (OSGi) or Spring-Boot framework, I personally prefer the Spring-Boot, because it's matches more to the microservice concept of a lighter deployment package. But it is up to you, the developer, after all you are the god and creator of your application. After the framework is chosen, developer will start developing the micro-integration services, composing between microservices or even use it to create a microservice. (With two frameworks, the development experience of the route itself is basically the same, by configuring camel components. )

Once the developer is ready to deploy the integration service, we can then decide how to deploy it onto the OpenShift platform. In FIS 2.0 there are two options, Binary S2i will build the entire application locally, and push it onto OpenShift, so OpenShift platform will use it to create and build the container image that it will run on, and for Source S2i, everything is build on top of OpenShift, so developer need to set the location of the source code in order for OpenShift to retrieve it to build the application and the container image.

And that is all. It is actually much much more powerful, it's hard to describe it in one go, dive into it, and you will soon find how fascinating the technology is, and how it can help you to resolve your current problems.

Here is a quick video that shows you how to get your first FIS 2.0 running.
The steps are as follows,


  • Install and start up OpenShift on your local machine 
  • Install FIS image stream definition into OpenShift (raw.githubusercontent.com/jboss-fuse/application-templates/application-templates-2.0.redhat-000026/fis-image-streams.json) 
  • In JBoss developer studio, create a Camel Spring-boot using the new archetype in FIS 2.0 
  • (Archetype catalog url: https://maven.repository.redhat.com/earlyaccess/all/io/fabric8/archetypes/archetypes-catalog/2.2.180.redhat-000004/archetypes-catalog-2.2.180.redhat-000004-archetype-catalog.xml)
  • Deploy to OpenShift using the Binary S2i tool (maven plugin)


Comments

Rick said…
Nice post. Thank you!
kavala pradeep said…
in Jbds I am running (using debug as) a route as local camel context, it has cxf endpoint(soap), route started and started listening at /order/. but the perspective is not going to debug and also message not stopping at breakpoints. Can you please advise on what I am doing wrong ...
Oliver Weise said…
This looks like Fuse Integration Services has not much to do with JBoss Fuse as we know it today at all, am I right? I assume even the Karaf deployments are vanilla Karaf servers and not related to the JBoss Fuse Karaf runtime?

Popular posts from this blog

Red Hat Fuse - Announcing Fuse 7 Tech preview 3 release.

Red Hat Fuse 7.0 technical preview three is out today! On the pathway to become one of the best cloud-native integration platform, Fuse gives developer freedom to choose how they want to develop the integration solution, where they want to deploy it and capabilities to address new integration personas that do not have development experience.
By supporting the three major runtime, developer is free to work on the runtime of their choice.By supporting standalone and cloud deployment, it simplifies the complexity to distinguish between these environments, allowing application to deploy freely among the environment of your choice. All levels of developers are welcome, you can either dive deep into creating customize complex integration logic, or using the new low code platform to quickly build a simple integration. In this Tech Preview release you get it all.
Fuse StandaloneSpring-boot for microserviceKaraf 4 for OSGi loverJBoss EAP for JavaEE developersFuse on OpenShiftPlugins for easy co…

JBoss EAP 6 - 效能調校 (一) DataSource 的 Connection Pool

效能沒有什麼Best Practice, 反正能調整的就那些。 通常,一個程式的效能大概有70-80% 都跟程式怎麼寫的其實比較有關係。

最近我最疼愛的小貓Puji 因為膀胱結石開刀的時候過世了,心情很差請原諒我的口氣沒有很好,也沒有心情寫部落格。

Puji R.I.P.

=======================正文=======================

這個題目很多人叫我寫,可是這題目好大,這分明就是整死我咩~
所以我會分幾段慢慢寫。

JBoss 的 SubsystemDatasource WebWeb Service EJB Hibernate JMSJCAJVM 調校OS (作業系統)

先來看一下 DataSource Subsystem, DataSource 的部分主要是針對Connection Pool 做調校。

通常,程式都會需要跟資料庫界接,電腦在本機,尤其是在記憶體的運算很快,但是一旦要外部的資源連接,就是會非常的耗資源。所以現在的應用程式伺服器都會有個Pool 放一些先連接好的 資料庫connection,當程式有需要的時候就可以馬上提供,而不用花那些多餘的資源去連接資料庫。

這就是為什麼要針對Connection Pool 去做調校。

以下會討論到的參數,都是跟效能比較有關係,Datasource 還有很多參數,像是檢核connection 是否正確的,我都不會提到。如果你追求的是非常快速的效能,那我建議你一個檢核都不要加。當然,這樣就會為伺服器上面執行的程式帶來風險。這就是你要在效能與正確,安全性上面的取捨了。 (套句我朋友說的話,不可能又要馬兒好,又要馬兒不吃草的..)

最重要的調校參數就是 Connection 的 Pool 數量。(也就是那個Pool 裡面要放幾條的connection.) 這個參數是每一個應用程式都不一樣的。

min-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最少會存留的connection 數量

max-pool-size 

Connection Pool 最多可以開啓的 connection 數量

prefill

事先將connection pool 裡面建立好min-pool-size 的connection.

我的建議是觀察一下平常程式要用到的量設定為 min-pool-size 。
加上…

Fuse - Contract First API Design with Apicurio and Fuse/Camel - Part One

This is part one of my two-article series that demonstrates the approach of implementing contract-first API design using Apicurioand Red Hat Fuse.

It covers how to create an OpenAPI standard document as the contract between API providers and consumers using Apicurio. It also shows how to quickly create mock tests using Red Hat Fuse.

There are two common approaches of creating these APIs.
Code FirstContract First Coming from a old time ESB developer, these are not new. We have been doing this forever. Before, it was the WSDL that define the contract of the service. we were doing a lot more code first, for me it's simply because it's much easier for me to write couple of Java classes and generate the WSDL for my consumer. 

It's often pretty straightforward if the consumer of your application has finalized how they want the service to be like. But you and I all know this is not often the case. So I had to go back to my code, and make the changes accordingly and pray I did not …